• Home
  • Movie News
  • Movie Trailers
  • Reviews
    • Cinema Reviews
    • Home Entertainment Reviews
      • Blu-ray Review
      • DVD Review
  • Competitions
  • Features
    • Interview

Movie Muser

Have your say about cinema

Focus (Blu-ray) – Will Smith is on the con

7th July 2015 By Tim Isaac


Before Focus went in front of the cameras there was huge amount of interest in it in Hollywood, with the likes of Ryan Gosling, Emma Stone, Ben Affleck and Kristen Stewart all being attached at one time or another. However, in the end it went to Will Smith and Margot Robbie as the two leads.

After watching it, I kind of wondered why so many people were so keen on it, as while fairly fun and decently entertaining, there’s very little to set it appear from a hundred other con-artist thrillers.

Will Smith plays Nicky, a veteran con-man who uses a mix of sleight of hand and psychological trickery to get cash out of his marks. He comes across small-scale hustler Jess (Margot Robbie), and reluctantly takes her under his wing, teaching her the con-artist ropes and pulling her into a sting with a massive pay-off.

Three years later they bump into each other again, this time when she is the girlfriend of racing car team owner Garriga (Rodrigo Santoro), and Nicky has been hired by that owner to con other teams into using a computer algorithm that’s supposed to make their cars go faster but will actually ensure Garriga’s cars have the edge. With each side having their own secrets and a romantic edge between Nicky and Jess, things begin to get complicated.

I said earlier I wasn’t sure why so many stars flirted with Focus, but actually I kind of do. It’s the sort of movie where on the page you can sell it as being The Sting crossed with Ocean’s 11, but with a modern, psychological-trickery edge (one of the characters even appears to be an American version of mental illusionist Derren Brown). However, while it’s always fun and fairly cool – even if when you think about it these are all terrible people who shamelessly steal for a living, with the film having a completely amoral attitude to that – the cons themselves and the way they’re presented aren’t really clever enough to raise this above being fairly standard fare.

Indeed, it would have been a rather tedious film at times if it weren’t for the charms of Will Smith and the excellent Margot Robbie, and it’ll be great to see them back together in next year’s Suicide Squad. Other characters unfortunately are a bit flat or don’t make a huge amount of sense, and there are also more than a few plot holes that don’t help things at all.

It certainly looks good though and there is an undeniable edge of cool the movie possesses, but ultimately it doesn’t add up to as much as it perhaps ought to. While I may have sounded down on the film, the fact is that it is fairly fun, it just perhaps ought to be more than it is.

Overall Verdict: It may ooze style and have cool leads, but Focus needed to concentrate more on the cons if it were really going to be great.

Special Features:
‘Masters of Misdirection: The Players in a Con’ Featurette
‘Will Smith: Gentleman Thief’ Featurette
‘Margot Robbie: Stealing Hearts’ Featurette
Deleted Scenes
Alternate Opening

Reviewer: Tim Isaac

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:

Chappie (DVD) – Neill Blomkamp returns with a robot tale

7th July 2015 By Tim Isaac


After District 9 there was huge amounts of excitement around director Neill Blomkamp, but Elysium disappointed and while Chappie is a bit of an improvement, it still has some problems.

Set a few years into the future, Johannesburg has become the first city in the world to deploy a robotic police force, with squadrons of humanoid ‘scouts’ keeping the peace and ensuring the criminals don’t get the upper hand. Deon (Dev Patel), who is one of the programmers behind the droids, thinks he’s worked out how to take things further – by giving a robot true human consciousness – but the company he works for aren’t interested.

However, he gets the chance when he is kidnapped by wannabe gangsters Ninja (Ninja) and Yo-Landi (Yo-Landi Visser), who want him to reactivate a broken bot. Deon downloads his new programme into the machine, but to Ninja’s annoyance he doesn’t immediately get a super-smart robot who can help him with crimes, instead getting a blank slate that needs to learn and develop a personality.

Deon understandably wants the machine – which soon gets nicknamed Chappie – to become a normal, moral ‘person’, but Ninja needs Chappie’s criminal help to get him out of a jam, and so he starts to lead the fast-growing-up bot astray. There’s also another major fly in the ointment in the form of Deon’s colleague Vincent (Hugh Jackman), who’s not pleased that his own robotics programme, the gigantic Moose, has been rendered obsolete by the far smarter, autonomous scouts, and who will do anything to get his machine back into the game.

As with Elysium, there are all sorts of brilliant ideas floating through Chappie, from the surprisingly smart idea of Chappie being a wannabe gangster robot (which is both funny and allows it to bring in some interesting social ideas) to the intriguing notion of watching a machine mentally grow from infancy into its teenage years over the course of a few days.

However, around that things are a lot more problematic, with a lot of annoying characters, plot points that don’t really make a huge amount of sense and a worldview that seems to think its painting things in shades of grey but is actually incredibly black and white. Unfortunately, while it has lots of ideas, it doesn’t really know where to take them, whether it’s what Chappie having a consciousness actually means or how a sense of morality is created – especially considering the scumminess and inhumanity of the world Chappie is growing up in.

While it’s interesting to see Hugh Jackman as a villain – and sporting an ugly mini-mullet – his character is way too over the top; a spitting, frothing bad guy who’s so extreme he doesn’t seem real. Indeed that’s the problem with quite a lot of the characters, that the film has things it wants them want them to do in order to create conflict or to make a point, but that rarely involves them coming across as real people. It is interesting to create a movie where the most realistic ‘human’ is a robot, but it’s not enough.

That said, Chappie is a brilliant creation, mixing some utterly believable special effects with an excellent motion capture performance from Blomkamp regular Sharlto Copley, along with humour, humanity and plenty of interesting ideas. It’s just that what’s going on around him isn’t as interesting as Chappie himself, with the result that it’s difficult not to be constantly reminded of other, better movies that have played with similar themes, from Blade Runner to Short Circuit.

Overall Verdict: Chappie looks incredible and it’s brimming over with great ideas, but unfortunately it isn’t sure what to do with either them or the plot, leaving it as a look at what makes us human, set amongst a lot of characters who don’t seem like actual people at all – except for the robot.

Special Features:
‘We Are Tetravaal’ featurette

Reviewer: Tim Isaac

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:

Terminator Genisys – He said he’d be back

1st July 2015 By Tim Isaac


Terminator 2: Judgment Day (T2 1991) is one of my all-time favourite films. I saw it when I was eight and it blew my tiny mind. It is the movie that sparked my passion for film and has led me on a varied journey through the world of film production to my keyboard writing this review for you.

The Terminator (T1 1984) is a classic chase movie about the fear of technology. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (T3 2003) was a rehash which had potential, but was spoilt by misplaced humour, and Terminator Salvation (T4 2009) needed its plot and characters streamlined and focused on the future war teased in T2.

Needless to say that I am a fan of the franchise and jumped at the chance to see the latest instalment in the hope that it could capture what made parts 1 and 2 so great, but I knew that there was a very strong chance that this would be a poor movie and yet another failed attempt to reboot a franchise from the 80s (see Robocop 2014).

Before seeing this film I would advise audiences to see T1 and T2 to understand the overall story. However I would advise that everyone see these excellent films anyway.

This film starts with a voiceover from Kyle Reece (Jai Courtney) describing judgement day, when a missile defence programme called Skynet went rogue in 1997 and decided to launce nuclear missiles across the globe to wipe out mankind. So far so Terminator, but not a year goes by where I don’t see San Francisco destroyed in a summer blockbuster.

Kyle was born during the war of the machines and we finally get to see the final attack against Skynet in 2029, led by humanity’s saviour, John Connor (Jason Clarke). They discover Skynet has sent back a Terminator (Arnold Schwarzenegger) to 1984 in order to kill John’s mother Sarah (Emilia Clarke), thus erasing the future leader of the resistance. Kyle is sent back to protect her but it’s not what you expect.

Most sequels follow a formula of showing what the audience liked from its predecessor but dressed up slightly differently, and this film is no exception. What we first see are exact recreations of the opening of T1 but with a new spin on things.

I always worry about spoiler territory but as the trailer gives away the first 20 minutes of the film anyway: The Terminator is greeted by the Guardian (an older Schwarzenegger), Kyle is greeted by a T1000 (Byung-hun Lee) and Sarah isn’t the weak character we know from T1.

The first half of the film for me as a fanboy was a joy to watch as the filmmakers were very faithful to the source material and there were countless nods to the first two films. Without spoiling it too much Sarah, Kyle and the Guardian are on a mission to stop Skynet and prevent Judgement Day.

T3 showed that Judgement dDy was delayed from 1997 but ultimately inevitable. This film builds on this idea but is far more aligned to our current world with inter-connecting technology like our computers and phones.

As such this is a modern Terminator film in terms of plot, storytelling and buckets of CGI. Like the last two instalments, Genisys has a lot of potential but it doesn’t make the most of it, and this new direction for the franchise unfortunately loses its way.

The first half is great as we see two seemingly indestructible enemies facing off against each other, and I like the role reversal where Sarah was the protector and Kyle needed protecting, reminiscent of the dynamic between John and Sarah in T2.

I had fun trying to figure out what was going on with plot developments halfway through the film but it became obvious that the villain would be dispatched, all three leads would survive, and it would be left open for a further sequel.

Jai Courtney’s Kyle and Emilia Clarke’s Sarah work well throughout, but the actors kind of seem miscast and aren’t the Kyle and Sarah we know from T1. A lot of work went into recreating various shots and scenes from T1 which are a joy to watch, but why couldn’t they get actors who could not only copy their predecessor’s performances and mannerisms to make the transition flawless?

Emilia Clarke is great in Game of Thrones but isn’t the hardened warrior Linda Hamilton is in T2. Also, Jai Courtney spends a lot of his time as a third wheel and doesn’t get a chance to develop his character.

Jason Clarke’s John Connor is a convincing resistance leader, but isn’t the battle-hardened vet we see in T2.

SPOILER ALERT he also just comes across self-indulgent and annoying when he is revealed as the films villain. I did like how they turned him into a new type of Terminator, yet he lacked the menace of the T1000 by simply smiling too much. Also if the T1000 can now control a T800 with a drip of its liquid, why can’t John control the Guardian with his nanobots? END OF SPOILERS.

Arnold Schwarzenegger hasn’t exactly set the box office alight since his return from politics and a new Terminator film was inevitable as it is his most iconic role. His performance is just what you expected and his Guardian has built on the humanisation elements of T2, some to great comic effect but his pronunciation of Kyle Reece as ‘Kal Reece’ becomes annoying. To quote he is old, but not obsolete.

It was great to see old and new Terminators fighting each other. The youthing effects work well and Arnie’s older Terminator is utterly convincing. I loved seeing the T1000 back but alas it was underused and a shame as Byung-hun Lee captures the mannerisms and menace perfectly.

The film also criminally underuses JK Simmons in a role I won’t disclose. I also remember it being a big deal when Matt Smith was announced for this film, and then silence. I won’t spoil the latter’s role but they both seem to have nothing more than cameos that will be expanded on in the inevitable sequel.

Of course it is the movie business and Skydance productions want to make the most of their investment before the rights go back. This is the first part in a planned trilogy and I’m glad that they have the confidence to try something different, but they need to up the ante in order to reach the heights of T1 and T2.

This seems like most of the right people were involved in making this and I like their new spin on it in order to revitalise the series. Skydance have successfully used the alternate-timeline plot device to successfully restart the Star Trek franchise, but there is no real sense of dread throughout the film and as such the ending suffers.

There is a brief mid-credits teaser which is unfortunately followed by a horrific song. Why not just use Brad Fiedel’s iconic theme?

Overall this is a prime example of a summer blockbuster laden with special effects, lots of laughs and some great and OTT action. The 3D is rubbish but it’s worth seeing for the many surprises that weren’t in the seemingly spoilerific trailers, the ‘Genisys’ reveal and the role reversals.

Overall Verdict: A good but not great attempt to reboot the franchise and I’m sure we will see the further two sequels. There are some great ideas and action sequences and its homages will please die-hard fans, but it’s just not as thrilling as T1 or T2.

Reviewer: George Elcombe

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:

A Letter To Three Wives (Blu-ray) – The double Oscar-winner goes HD

28th June 2015 By Tim Isaac


I have always wanted to see A Letter To Three Wives, but I’m almost ashamed to say I’d never watched it before. The reason I was keen to see it is that All About Eve is one of my favourite movies ever, and this is the other film for which Joseph L. Mankiewicz won both a Best Director and Best Screenplay Oscar.

I’m glad to say I wasn’t completely disappointed by the film, although I can see why the movie has fallen out of favour compared to much of Mankiewicz’s other work, such as Cleopatra and The Barefoot Contessa. While not that many younger people have seen the 1949 Oscar winner, they may find the plot oddly familiar, as more recently it served as the basis for an episode of The Simpsons.

Deborah (Jeanne Crain), Lora Mae (Linda Darnell) and Rita (Ann Sothern) are heading off on a boat for the day to look after a group of children, when they receive a letter from their ‘friend’, Addie Ross, who says she has abruptly left town and has taken one of their husbands with her.

Initially the women brush it off as one of Addie’s games, but as the day goes on they all start to wonder whether their hubby may have left them and they each reminisce about their lives and relationships. Deborah loves the idea of living a posh, middle-class, Country Club life, but feels that she will never quite fit in due to her farm girl background. Lora Mae grew up poor and knew exactly what she was doing when trying to reel in older, divorced Porter, but after genuinely falling for him she fears they will never escape the almost transactional nature of their early relationship. Rita meanwhile is a successful radio writer, who has a tendency to put the needs of her boss over those of her husband (played by a young Kirk Douglas), which leaves him feeling rather emasculated.

All the husbands like Addie (who we never actually see, although she provides the narration) and see her as a kind of perfect woman, but has any of them actually run off with her?

Fairly early on it becomes apparent why A Letter To Three Wives has not stayed the well-loved classic it might have been, and that’s to do with its rather old-fashioned attitude towards women. Deborah seems almost desperate to feel like she’s given up her individuality and become an adjunct to her husband, while Rita must learn that the man is in charge and that if she’s going to be a career woman, she can’t expect to be an independent one. But that’s the problem with women – they will insist on thinking they’re people in their own right!

It is incredibly old-fashioned in its attitudes, but it’s also one of the many older films which is now seen as sexist, but which was actually thought as being quite progressive at the time, in this case particularly how it dealt with the issues left behind after World War II, when women had been allowed out of the house but were suddenly meant to go back inside again when the men returned home. Things have moved on massively since the 1940s though (thank goodness), leaving A Letter To Three Wives far behind and with a view on sexual politics that would be actively offensive if anyone made the same movie today.

If you look past that though it is a very entertaining film. It’s smartly written (attitudes aside), and cleverly plotted as it looks into the lives of the three women and the situation they now find themselves in, all with a great hook of the audience waiting to discover who may have run off with Addie. Even the sexist side is worth watching, as it’s an interesting document on women’s position at the time and what was seen as the way to be happy.

The movie looks extremely good on Blu-ray. In fact it’s looking better than any film from 1949 has a right to, helped by the great classic Hollywood visuals and a restoration that’s done an excellent job of removing grain and other problems. You also get a choice of 5.1 sound or the original mono audio and a couple of decent special features, including radio versions of A Letter To Three Wives and newsreel footage of the Academy Awards where Mankiewicz won his Oscar for the film.

Overall Verdict: This is the sort of film – of which there are quite a few – which would be classed as a bona fide classic if it weren’t for the fact times have moved on and its attitudes, in this case about women’s place in society, are positively prehistoric. Outside its ‘little women should stop having thoughts of their own’ views it is an extremely well made and entertaining film, but it certainly gets no points for modern feminism values.

Reviewer: Tim Isaac

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:

Last Knights (DVD) – Clive Owen goes a little Game Of Thrones

28th June 2015 By Tim Isaac


I won’t waste your time too much with this review, as I can sum up my thoughts in two word – don’t bother. This is a Czech and South Korean co-production, loosely based on an old Japanese movie, and with a multi-national cast all speaking English in various random accents – it is therefore perhaps not surprising that it is a bit confused as to what the hell it’s all about.

Set somewhere that’s sort of a fusion of Medieval Europe and Asia, but also with fantasy undertones (it should come as no surprise that Last Knights feels a little like a misguided Game Of Throne fan film), Clive Owen is a knight who finds himself cast into the wilderness after the fall of his master (Morgan Freeman), and must band together with a group of other knights – 47 Ronin style – to regain their honour.

This is the sort of film where at first I kept rewinding it because I kept feeling that I’d missed something important. However, then I looked at the expression on the actors’ faces and realised that they had no clue what was go on either. If you are looking for what depth the actors bring to their characters, almost to a person behind their eyes you can see them saying, ‘At least I’m getting paid for this’.

The set-up for the plot takes way too long, the logic of the world is inconsistent, and the cod-Shakespearean dialogue varies between stupid and confusing. The action and sword-play could have been extremely cool, but it constantly feels like the camera operator was given a series of complex moves to make, but always gets there half a second too late and so you miss what you’re supposed to be seeing.

As you can probably tell by now, I was not a fan. In fact I’m struggling to find anything nice to say about it. Umm, well, I suppose some of the locations were nice – although it’s pretty bad when empty shots of the medieval Czech buildings and sets would have been more entertaining than what they put in them.

Overall Verdict: Like I said at the start of this review – don’t bother.

Reviewer: Tim Isaac

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:

Jupiter Ascending (Blu-ray) – The Wachowskis head for space

28th June 2015 By Tim Isaac


When Jupiter Ascending was moved from a prime Summer 2014 cinema release to early 2015, it didn’t auger well. And when the reviews finally rolled in, it looked like people were right to be suspicious of the Wachowskis’ $175 million space opera. However, while it’s far from being a masterpiece, there is just about enough fun peeking through the nonsense.

Mila Kunis is Jupiter Jones, a seemingly normal girl from a Russian immigrant family, who is working as a cleaner and unsure what to do with her life (or even if she should bother to do anything). However, it turns out she is the genetic reincarnation of a murdered space queen, and because of that, she should be able to inherit the queen’s vast wealth.

There is a problem though, which is that the queen’s children – played by Eddie Redmayne, Douglas Booth and Tuppence Middleton – are vying for power over the Abraxas family’s vast estates and massive business empire (which includes Earth), and the emergence of Jupiter threatens all of that.

While one of the children sends out squads to kill Jupiter, another hires ex-military, genetic-splice wolf-man Caine (Channing Tatum) to protect her. Unsurprisingly Jupiter is rather shocked about all this and has no idea what to do once she is suddenly thrust into the middle of this interplanetary power struggle.

For the past decade the Wachowskis haven’t ever quite managed to recapture the magic of the first Matrix movie, and while Jupiter Ascending is an attempt to create something both entertaining and grandiose, it doesn’t quite work, although it is minorly entertaining.

The main problem is its overly operatic tone, which ends up highlighting quite how silly a lot of it is. This is immensely dumb popcorn entertainment dressed up in far grander clothes, but its mix of influences never really comes together. The story is very deliberately reminiscent of a fairy tale, and there are shades of everything from Dune to Brazil (Terry Gilliam even shows up at one point). But rather than effective world-building and creation of an idiosyncratic part sci-fi, part fantasy universe, it’s all a bit of a mess.

The story itself is essentially a series of damsel in distress scenarios, where Jupiter gets into trouble and then Caine saves her in all sorts of improbable ways, while causing as much explosive carnage as possible. Around that is a lot of nonsense and actors wandering around looking slightly uncertain about what they’re doing. At least Eddie Redmayne gives it his all, but his choice of playing Balem Abraxas in such a camp, hammy, moustache-twirling way is so farcical someone should go and take his Best Actor Oscar back (in fact he should have probably followed in Sandra Bullock’s footsteps and won an Oscar and a Razzie in the same year).

It is partially difficult to blame him though, as many of the characters are so vapid you can understand the impetus to turn them into over the top cartoons. Channing Tatum meanwhile goes the other direction and decides mumbling will help ground his brooding part-man, part-wolf (who to be honest looks more like a cyber-elf), but while far more effective than Redmayne, it still can’t hide that there’s little heft to Caine.

There is a major plus side though, which is that it looks exceedingly cool. There is some beautiful imagery, both in space and on Earth, and the action is certainly explosive, kinetic and fun to watch. In fact, if the movie had toned down the Dune-esque space-operatics and the dubious logic of its themes, and instead just sold itself as action, sci-fi fun, it would have probably been a lot more successful. As you’d expect from the Wachowskis, they attempt to make social and philosophical points, but what they say is either obvious or not particularly well thought out – and also revisits many themes they already handled better in The Matrix – so they become more tedious than interesting.

I am starting to think the Wachowskis need to stop writing their own films. As directors they are good, with a fine visual style and good instincts for keeping a film moving, but following The Matrix their writing has been baggy, lacking in logic, far too interested in ideas it thinks are profound but are actually fairly basic, and generally messy. You have to appreciate here their attempts to create a slice of sci-fi that is grand, pansexual and visually opulent, but in the end most of that feels like baggage around what would otherwise have been a fairly simple and fun fairy-tale – complete with a commoner becoming a princess/queen. The fun is still there in fits and starts, but the rest may raise a few eyebrows.

Overall Verdict: The visuals and action is entertaining, and the basics of the plot are okay (although it won’t exactly win any feminism awards), but everything surrounding that is so over the top it almost ruins the fun.

Special Features:
Jupiter Jones: Destiny Is Within Us
Jupiter Ascending: Genetically Spliced Caine Wise: Interplanetary Warrior
The Wachowskis: Minds Over Matter
Worlds Within Worlds Within Worlds
Bullet Time Evolved
From Earth to Jupiter (And Everywhere in Between)

Reviewer: Tim Isaac

CHECK OUT THESE RELATED ARCHIVES:
« Previous Page
Next Page »

Search this site…

Get Social

RSSTwitterFacebook

Get new posts by e-mail

Get the latest in our daily e-mail

Latest Cinema & Home Ent. Reviews

Mortal Engines (Cinema Review)

Anna and the Apocalypse (Cinema Review)

Suspiria (Cinema Review)

Overlord (Cinema Review)

King of Thieves (Cinema Review)

Isle of Dogs (DVD Review)

Mission: Impossible – Fallout (Cinema Review)

Tomb Raider (Blu-ray Review)

The Bridge 4 (DVD Review)

My Friend Dahmer (Cinema Review)

Latest News & Trailers

Detective Pikachu Trailer – Pokemon is going live action with Ryan Reynolds

Toy Story 4 Teaser Trailer – Woody & the gang are coming back once more

Aladdin Teaser Trailer – Guy Ritchie directs Disney’s latest live-action adaptation

New Glass Trailer – The worlds of Unbreakable and Split meet

Aquaman Extended Trailer – Jason Momoa goes to war under the seas against Patrick Wilson

New Overlord Trailer – Soldiers take on Nazi-created zombies in the JJ Abrams produced movie

The Mule Trailer – Clint Eastwood is an octogenarian drug runner opposite Bradley Cooper

Vice Trailer – Christian Bale transforms into former Vice President Dick Cheney

Mary Queen of Scots Trailer – Saoirse Ronan & Margot Robbie get Elizabethan

New Mortal Engines Trailer – London is literally on the move in the steampunk fantasy

Handpicked MediaHandpicked MediaCopyright © 2025 Muser Media · Powered by WordPress & Genesis Framework · Log in
Movie Muser is a member of The Handpicked Media network

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT
 

Loading Comments...
 

You must be logged in to post a comment.