What we have here is an action vehicle for Sean Penn which may or may not turn into a franchise. On the surface this film may seem like a thinking man’s action thriller but in reality it’s not and the trailer gave a lot away. Some of you may see the twists coming and be able to guess the overall narrative mystery, but it’s probably best to just go along with the ride.
The plot revolves around Jim (Penn), a former bodyguard / hired militant / assassin whose past is catching up with him. Eight years after assassinating a target in Africa, his life is under threat and he must travel to London, Barcelona and Gibraltar to seek out former colleagues and unravel the mystery of who wants him dead.
As always, I don’t want to give away the whole plot but if you are a fan of action thrillers then you know what to expect. This film has a European Luc Besson feel, no surprise as is directed by Pierre Morel, who previously helmed Taken (2008), which is a good film but really overrated in my opinion.
It takes elements from the Bond franchise, including various locations, guns, a girl and a classic sports car. Although the best comparison to this film is the Bourne trilogy (2002 – 2007) as we have an overarching mystery, various locations, the effects of killing, and a bit of shaky-cam action sequences mixing precision hand-to-hand combat and shootouts. However this film isn’t as good.
One criticism I had was with the editing of the fight sequences. You couldn’t really see the combat due to tight framing and quick cuts, but in contrast when someone got shot you could see it in all its full brutal glory. My issue is that guns are worse than fists or knives, but as with a lot of Hollywood films guns are seen as tame as you can distance yourself from the target. This however does not apply to the whole film as we do get some rather grotesque shots, especially in the final fight.
But like The Dark Knight (2008), all of the action sequences are derived from the plot and don’t feel out of place or needless. This is one of the film’s strengths. Whilst not really original, the strong story and good script keeps the narrative going and doesn’t sag.
The big reveal is predictable and it’s little surprise from the opening that Jim’s girlfriend Annie (Trinca) gets together with Felix (Bardem) creating a love triangle of sorts. However the relationship between Jim and Annie is an element I found to be nicely put together, dealing with hearts from the past and how jealousy can blind.
This film shows the long term damage and effects of conflict and corporate greed on the people on each side and is another of its strengths.
Sean Penn shows off a body that has spent many an hour in the gym and thankfully still has his acting chops. Nowadays we like our action stars to be flawed but wise. Middle-aged actors definitely convey this, just take Liam Neeson.
Like in Elysium (2013), Jim has an illness which gets worse as the film progresses and adds to his vulnerability. This illness is explained as a result of post-traumatic stress and as expected hinders him at the worst possible moments. However this Illness isn’t referenced at the end and is an open plot point for a possible sequel.
Javier Bardem is unfortunately underused in this film. He is a master of expression and is great in everything I’ve seen him in. As Jim’s frenemy he unfortunately plays second fiddle and does the best with his character. The same can be said for Idris Elba’ DuPont. I won’t disclose his character but he owns every scene he’s in. Unfortunately there aren’t many of these. Jasmine Trinca is good as Annie and plays above the average Bond girl archetype. Ray Winstone even turns up too.
In regards to the cinematography it looks like a Bourne film but could have had some nicer establishing shots of the locations. A nice touch was to open the film with a news montage explaining the conflict in the Congo over natural resources. This technique is always effective as it makes the story more real, unless they are using a segment featuring Piers Morgan.
I noticed Amazon Prime in the opening credits and it’s interesting to see that online services are making their way to the big screen. No surprise seeing how big Netflix and others are and the quality of its original content.
In a nutshell this film is an entertaining mystery which doesn’t really add anything new, but is perfectly watchable. I was a bit concerned that the trailer may have given it all away, but I forgot various key plot points exposed in the trailer, and unfortunately have to say that this film is pretty forgettable too.
Overall Verdict: Entertaining enough but not what it hoped to be. Strong performances from the cast, but nothing overall original or memorable.
Reviewer: George Elcombe